Friday Brainstorm 6 š§
Memory, open loops, and a personal letter
Hi friends,
Happy Friday and welcome back for the sixth issue of Friday Brainstorm!
Hereās an overview of whatās in store:
how poverty is perpetuated on a cognitive level š°
a system for closing āopen loopsā ā°
a personal letter to myself š„
As always,Ā I want to hear from you. As you read the newsletter, Iād love to hear your thoughts and reactions, related resources youāve found inspiring, as well as any feedback around how I can make these better - just reply directly to this email.
Freeing up our mental resourcesĀ š±
In the last issue, we explored the potential downsides of the internet changing how we think. What about the potential upside?
We no longer have to keep various things running in the background of our memory. Before smartphones, if you had to remind yourself to do something, youād physically write it down. This solves one problem, but if itās a time-sensitive task, you still have to remember when it has to be done.
Today, a to-do app can deliver a reminder at exactly the right time without you having to think about it. This may seem insignificant, but freeing up our memory is necessary for more valuable uses of your mental resources (e.g. new ideas, problem-solving).
In the words of Jessica Kerr:
Pretend your brain is a white board. Is it covered with to-do lists and āDO NOT ERASEā? Is there space for drawing and combining ideas?
A famous 2013 study showed that people living in poverty do worse on spatial and reasoning tasks when considering future financial decisions. The authors were the first to examine how poverty might be perpetuated on a cognitive level, with people having to constantly be pre-occupied with decisions about how to make and spend money.
This is an extreme example, but it goes to say that even small day-to-day mental calculations have a significant effect on unrelated cognitive tasks.
Itās clear that reducing the cognitive demands of everyday tasks is in our best interests, but we donāt always do it. The research suggests that weāre biased towards strategies with the least effort involved. Based on past experience, if storing the information in short-term memory is easier than writing it down, then weāll do that.
How can we make sure that the decision is always tilted in favor of writing it down? We need a simple external system that we trust and very little friction to use.
Letās get into perhaps the most famous one š
Closing open loops ā°
To perform at our best, we need to offload the mental demands of āopen loopsā, or commitments that you made to yourself or someone else that havenāt been fulfilled yet. Open loops range from simple tasks (mental shopping lists) to more complex tasks (needing to respond to an email).
This is important because our brains have a tendency to recall and ruminate on unfinished or interrupted tasks more than completed tasks (Zeigarnik effect).
Just like open tabs in a browser, open loops take up valuable bandwidth in your brain.
David Allenās Getting Thing Done (GTD) framework is built around closing open loops, so that your brain stops keeping track of all the things you need to do. As we said before, this opens up the possibility for more valuable types of thinking.
The basic idea is having an āinā list that captures ideas, tasks, and anything else you might want to remember. The rest of the system is dedicated to systematically processing the āinā list. Hereās a visual summary of the process by Erland Hamberg:
Part of the magic of this system is that you can have complete trust that everything will be dealt with. This trust is really important because your brain will not free up memory unless itās completely sure that the external system is reliable and consistent.
Systems are important and worth investing time into. As James Clear puts it,
You donāt rise to the level of your goals. You fall to the level of your systems.
For a quick intro to the GTD system, check out Erland Hambergās guide.
What Iām Writing š„
This is a departure from what I usually write about ā a few months ago I wrote a letter to myself about why I decided against going to med school. It was inspired by a former classmateās piece about dropping out of law school.
I never had any intention of publishing the letter, but I didnāt finish the article I had originally wanted to include in this newsletter. Iām trying something new here.
Hereās an excerpt from the article:
Medical school (and other similar institutions) have a very strict hierarchy, and there is only one path to advance in your medical career. There is good reason for this ā the consequences are high in the medical field and you want to make sure that doctors have many years of experience before practicing.
Meanwhile in other fields, credentials are growing less and less important. MBA programs are seeing less and less demand because the internet has opened up the potential to create opportunities for yourself. There are cheaper and faster ways to demonstrate your own value to employers than traditional degrees (e.g. writing online, building products).
Itās an exciting time to be young, because you can have have a huge impact without waiting your turn. That being said, the hierarchy of the medical profession is antithetical to this societal trend.
Read the rest of the article here š
š„ Why I Decided Against Med School š„
I hope youāve enjoyed this edition of Friday Brainstorm! What did you think? Anything that stood out or sparked your curiosity? Let me know by replying to this email.
āShamay